Are there any coming soon Astro and what will they cover?

Many thanks in advance!!

:-D

it is the internet, like a court, anything you say or, do can and will be used against you

Just… throwing that out. We're the friendly, chummy bunch after all.

But yes, he wants attention, we're fattening him up on it, no arguments from me there.

Apparently, Ivan Gorelik doesn't fall in under the latter category so why not simply stop feeding this lunacy any further?

Everyone with even the most basic knowledge of physics knows that he is wrong, and why he is wrong. But Ivan is obviously smarter than every single scientist in the whole wide world and is light years beyond the Standard model of physics.

I mean, come on, should we really allow ourselfs to step down to his level of sanity? I think not. We, and all the readers of this page and its forums are better than him. Just ignore him, there is absolutelly no point in having any kind of discussion with him.

You continue to make the error of confusing repetition of your claims with defending them.

That is way, I named nucleus by “nuclear quasi-holes”.

Yes, your entire "argument" (and I use that term loosely) is based around you making up ideas and words that have no demonstrable connection to anything in reality.

Dear DeathDealer, try my program http://darkenergy.narod.ru/Explosion.exe and look how many days does the Explosion last. Investigate, please, this interval dependence from the quantity of created microscopic droplets; from the velocity of particles in the hot plasma babbles around the droplets; from the density of dark matter inside droplets. If you will make it, you will understand, that it is quite early to say that contemporary collisions at LHC are safe. If you do not trust my program, make the analogues program yourself, please.

Dear UndeadxNurse, do not lie, please. In my page “Crude Errors in Risk Assessment of Colliders”, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html you can find the text which contradicts to your assertion. I’ll copy part of it here:

Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of Stephen Hawking.
In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC”
http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html you can find a dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.

Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. … Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible happens."

This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.

The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B.
A. Collisions of protons at LHC;
B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.

Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make microscopic magnetic holes.

Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter are drastically great.
A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities.
B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have relativistic velocities.

Result:
A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth.
B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately. Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. Physicists observe such showers.

Analogy:
Let’s compare the behavior of “nuclear quasi-hole” with the behavior of magnetic hole. Let’s investigate two cases:

A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies, equal to several in eV.
B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.

Approximate result:
A. Collapse:
p+n -> d;
d+n -> t -> He3+e;
He3+n -> He4;
He4+n -> He5;
He5+n -> He6 -> Li6+e;
Li6+n -> Li7;
Li7+n -> Li8 -> Be8+e;
Be8+n -> Be9;
Be9+n -> Be10;
…
U235+n -> X+Y+2n
X+n ->…; Y+n ->…
two branches;
…
four branches;
…
eight branches;
…

B. Evaporation. TeV-energy neutrons will ruin the nucleus in the backward order in crude approximation.

Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic forces of protons. That is way, I named nucleus by “nuclear quasi-holes”.
Magnetic collapse has no limit. Magnetic hole will grow till there is the food, - the matter of planet or star.

Physicists, did you see the difference?

Look here: [[http://darkenergy.narod.ru/sn1987.jpg]]

That is an image of remnants of exploded star.
You can see there three beautiful semi axial rings.
Axial symmetry says us that there was the magnetic collapse, but not the gravity collapse.
Magnetic hole has axial symmetry because it is a compact magnetic dipole.
Black hole must have spherical symmetry, if it is not rotate.

The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. The strength of magnetic field in this region is about 10^16 teslas. Because of the strong magnetic interaction, this small magnetic hole will move on spiral trajectory to the Sun. As a result, the Sun will explode and astronomy amateurs from neighbor stellar systems will observe novae or supernovae phenomenon. Alien stephen hawkings will say: “The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. … Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible happens”

I'd want to do a lot more to the doomsayers then just grab them and shake them but that's just me.

Oh, I agree, but if I were to do to them, what I'm really thinking about doing to them, I would be sent to another planet and labeled as a danger to the Human race.