Comments for page "Nibiru"

elipses had 2 foci

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:03:36 +0000

The same thing happened to me last night when I looked at the moon. A second moon appeared next to the moon and bobbed around, because it was like a lens flare caused by the window. When I opened the window and looked at the moon, I saw just one moon as normal. When I shut the window and looked through the double-glazed window again the moon dog came back.

Re: elipses had 2 foci

Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:48:07 +0000

lol, i took pictures of the sun too, i saw nibiru as well, except it appeared on the left side of the sun….

Re: elipses had 2 foci

Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:05:23 +0000

LoL, what I find funny, yet interesting is that in this alleged image of Nibiru, well… Nibiru has no reflection in the ocean.

Wait…

Let me guess, it's invisible? Or better yet maybe it's a vampire planet, hence the 'no reflection'.

Anyways, it's a fake. Pure, plain, and simple.

Re: Poor Science

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:28:00 +0000

LoL that is so funny when ppl show them pics of the little spot on the right side of the sun….May god be with us tell them to stop this nonsense….lense flar !!!!!!!!

Re: elipses had 2 foci

Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:45:40 +0000

uh huh… and why does it only appear in pictures from cheap cameras? Why is it that when I put my scope (properly filtered, of course) on the sun that no additional object appears?

elipses had 2 foci

Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:35:02 +0000

Nibiru didn´t know it, but is on the right of the Sun!
heading on the way of Earth:
see:
http://poleshift.ning.com/photo/second-sun?context=latest

Poor Science

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:09:06 +0000

When I was in school a math professor told us to never never never use more than three decimal places in an Astronomy problem. So I always use at least six decimal places. If there is not enough data for six decimal places I go back and find that data. Even if it takes 30 years or more.

A tiny fraction can make the difference beteen our Sun and the Sombrero Galaxy.

Re: Poor Translations

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:50:49 +0000

I misspelled Brown Dwarfs because something crashed into my computer connection while I was typing.

Poor Translations

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:41:43 +0000

When I was in Hih School we were told that an ancient Chinese book had two list of planets. Each list had 4 planets listed so that assumed that 4+4=8. Everyone that has used a translator knows that Scinetist don't become translators. A scientist would ask why two list of 4 instead of one list of 8.

I looked into that and all the planets were visible to the naked eye. Could the ancient Chinese see 8 planets with the naked eye? 4 Brown Dwarth can be seen with the naked eye.