Comments for page "Michele De Nostradame"

(no title)

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:01:16 +0000

If you are talking about the Bible and Revelations, know that in the first paragraph of Revelations it says blah blah blah, but the time is near. This book was written long before today, therefore it cannot relate to today in most cases.

(no title)

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:58:03 +0000

and it does have references to some of the things you say are wrong.

Where?

The Bible will tell you if these things that are predicted are true or false.

There is no need for that. Look at the sidebar.

(no title)

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:49:39 +0000

You say you've researched every thing. What about the Bible? I believe the Bible, and it does have references to some of the things you say are wrong.

So you mean that the sun really did got blocked out by Elenin for 3 whole days the last few days? Because that was predicted in the bible.
Bible experts told me so.

I think you can safely deduce from the many failed bible predictions that the bible is never intended to predict anything.

(no title)

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:47:28 +0000

You say you've researched every thing.

Nobody here said that.

What about the Bible? I believe the Bible,

Beliefs are a dime a dozen.

…and it does have references to some of the things you say are wrong.

Name one.

The Bible will tell you if these things that are predicted are true or false.

No, it won't. Biblical "prophecy" is just as vague and shoehorn-prone as Nostradamus et al.

Me believing what the Bible says tells me that you are full of it too.

See above.

Seems we have yet another angry poster who so desperately wants to disagree, but can't present anything that even resembles evidence or argument. Those are a dime a dozen, too.

(no title)

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:47:22 +0000

Me believing what the Bible says tells me that you are full of it too.

Don't be vague. Tell us where we are 'full of it' and why.

(no title)

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:32:26 +0000

Bearing in mind that the more ominous verses of the Bible refer to entirely different things, before you decide to bring in such things as Revelations, which was directed at Domitian…

(no title)

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:24:45 +0000

You say you've researched every thing. What about the Bible? I believe the Bible, and it does have references to some of the things you say are wrong. The Bible will tell you if these things that are predicted are true or false. Me believing what the Bible says tells me that you are full of it too.

(no title)

Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:52:11 +0000

Was it Nostradamus that predicted that a great disaster would befall the Earth in May 1999? Because worryingly, that just so happens to be the same month Livin' La Vida Loca by Ricky Martin was number one nearly everywhere in the world.

(no title)

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:01:49 +0000

The prophecy was alleged to have been made in the 12th century, but no mention of it ever seems to have been made until the 16th century, the date of the alleged forgery. Furthermore, the descriptions of each pope are accurate up until the 16th century (exactly what would be expected if they were written afterwards), but become far less accurate after that date when they really were having to guess the future.
There is more here.

(no title)

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:07:21 +0000

hmmm and how can we tell its forgery. im just interested

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:49:58 +0000

It doesn't say the world will end it says that Rome will be destroyed. But since it's a forgery and the prophecies have to be forced to fit as well as the minor detail that prophecy doesn't work (James Randi has $1 million waiting for the first person who is able to demonstrate that it does), you needn't pay any attention to it.

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:35:56 +0000

umm also the prophecie is that after the last pope dies the world will end?

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:30:45 +0000

oh so soorry i didnt see this page so i posted it twice

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:26:03 +0000

Hmm, yes, exactly.

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:19:22 +0000

so the prophecies of the pope are vague, and that they can be interpreted (is that what your saying)

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:54:29 +0000

They are certainly vague. If you look at the Wikipedia page here you'll see that the prophecy for Pope John Paul II has no fewer than 12 different ways it can be made to fit and that for Pope Benedict XVI has 9.

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:53:52 +0000

You could say that.

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:52:10 +0000

so the prophecies of the popes are vague

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:54 +0000

i dont understand what u meen

He means that for any number of random guesses, we would expect the chances of one being "right" to go up as more guesses are made. However, the chances of that happening are pretty low, and would probably require many thousands of guesses. The thing about so-called prophecy is that it's nearly always vague, and proponents just wait for something they can fill in the blanks with. I don't know of any "specific" so-called prophecy that turned out to be unambiguously correct.

(no title)

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:25:57 +0000

i dont understand what u meen