<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;David Flynn&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show</link>
		<description></description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:57:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818912</guid>
				<title>Re: Temple at the Center of Time by David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818912</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>TheGreatJuju</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>469590</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>There are 360 degrees in a circle.<br /> Before Noah's flood the Earth took 360 days to circle the Sun. Hence 360 days in a year, and the Earth moved 1 degree round the Sun each day.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Considering that…</p> <ul> <li>the earth's orbit is <a href="http://www.windows2universe.org/the_universe/uts/earth3.html">not a circle</a>, nor is there any evidence that it ever was, especially not since humans have existed,</li> <li>there is <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html">no evidence of any such flood</a>,</li> <li>there are ~365.25 days in a year, and this number changes with time,</li> </ul> <p>…well, you get the point.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>and the Earth moved 1 degree round the Sun each day.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>This would require a circle orbit, which our planet does not have.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>7 days in a week - from creation week,</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Various cultures have used calendars with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Week#.22Weeks.22_in_other_calendars">widely varying week lengths</a>, some of which are still in use today.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>Pi is an immutable number relating the length of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.<br /> If you multiply 360 x 7 x Pi, you come up with the diameter of the earth in statute miles.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>The earth is an oblate spheroid. Also, disregarding the incorrectness of 360 and impreciseness of 7, your (or Flynn's) math is 9.5 miles short.</p> <p>Diameter of earth in miles: 7,926.3352</p> <p>360 x 7 x 3.14159 = 7,916.8068</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>If you multiply 360 x 6 x Pi you come up with the circumference of the moon in statute miles.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>This figure is within 5 miles but still wrong. Why 6, instead of 7? Why circumference, instead of something else? Why is it significant?</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>These examples stretch coincidence to the limit.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>These examples are utterly stupid if not completely wrong, and even if they weren't, simply citing them doesn't make them significant.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>Incidentally 360 is the smallest number divisible by 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 and 9.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>So what?</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>The smallest number divisible by 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 is 2520, which is the number of days in seven prophetic years - mentoned particularly in the Book of Daniel 9:24-27.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>I never fail to be amused by people who play with numbers in search of what they dub "Creator," while the whole time they operate from a presupposition that the Judeo-Christian God is he/she/it. You don't let the evidence lead you to a conclusion. You form a conclusion, then manufacture "evidence" to fit it. This can be done with almost anything. Pardon the cyber-lingo, but <a href="http://www.skepdic.com/numology.html">numerology is an epic fail</a>.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>In my humble opinion I believe that the last seven years - 2520 days - of this phase of creation,</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>You're off by a month or so.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>before the final return of Jesus Christ,</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Yawn.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>will likely start with a seven year peace treaty/ceasefire between Israel and her Islamic neighbours around 2012.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Kinda like the dozens of ceasefires that have already come and gone. Seems like there's a new one every week.</p> <p>Crackpottery.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818884</guid>
				<title>Re: Temple at the Center of Time by David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818884</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Astrogeek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>334222</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hello David;</p> <p>The examples you cite do not leave me all that impressed.</p> <p>For example: There are 360 degrees in a circle. This is defined, by us (humans). There is no natural basis for this division. Rather it was invented by the Babylonians because "60" was the basis for their numbering system. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_numerals">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_numerals</a></p> <p>This is why we have 60 minutes in an hour, and 60 seconds in a minute, and why there are 360 (60*6) degrees in a circle.</p> <blockquote> <p>Before Noah's flood the Earth took 360 days to circle the Sun.</p> </blockquote> <p>Before I accept this claim, you will have to provide evidence that "Noah's flood" was a real, global event, and that the solar year was 360 days before this event, and that it changed to a 365.25 day solar year after this event.</p> <blockquote> <p>7 days in a week - from creation week</p> </blockquote> <p>No, that is culturally dependent. The ancient Babylonian calendar, for example had 3&nbsp;7-day weeks followed by a 9- or 10-day week to align with the lunar cycle. As shown on our <a href="http://www.2012hoax.org/mayan-calendar">mayan-calendar</a> page, the Maya used a combination of 13-day and 20-day "weeks" and the Assyrians used a 5-day week.</p> <p><a href="http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/calendar-ancient.html#anchor-near-east">http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/calendar-ancient.html#anchor-near-east</a></p> <blockquote> <p>7 colours of the rainbow</p> </blockquote> <p>Actually there are innumerable colors in a rainbow… it is a continuum of color, not seven distinct colors.</p> <blockquote> <p>7 notes before a repeat</p> </blockquote> <p>Again, this is culturally dependent. In the western system, there are 7 primary notes, and 5 minor notes, for a total of 12. The seven primary notes are not equidistant in terms of frequency either. The difference between A and B (a whole step) is double that of C and D (a half-step). There are different scales that have been used, and some very odd-sounding ones (to our western ears) in Asia.</p> <blockquote> <p>Pi is an immutable number relating the length of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.</p> </blockquote> <p>Yes? Your point is?</p> <blockquote> <p>If you multiply 360 x 7 x Pi, you come up with the diameter of the earth in statute miles.</p> </blockquote> <p>No, actually you don't.</p> <p>Your calculation yields 7916.8068</p> <p>The diameter of the earth at the equator is 7,926.28 miles <em><strong>at the equator</strong></em>, but through the poles it is diameter is 7,899.80 miles.</p> <blockquote> <p>If you multiply 360 x 6 x Pi you come up with the circumference of the moon in statute miles.</p> </blockquote> <p>Close again, but not quite. Your calculation yields 6785.8344 miles, whereas the circumference is 6,790 miles. I'm sure that this would change if you measured it differently as well.</p> <blockquote> <p>The smallest number divisible by 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 is 2520, which is the number of days in seven prophetic years - mentoned particularly in the Book of Daniel 9:24-27.</p> </blockquote> <p>Only if I accept your premise of a 360-day year.</p> <p>Humans are pattern-seeking animals, and we are good at finding patterns and significance where they don't actually exist.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818880</guid>
				<title>Re: Temple at the Center of Time by David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818880</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Kevin</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I'm soo lost!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818873</guid>
				<title>Re: Temple at the Center of Time by David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818873</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Winters1</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>435139</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Thanks for nothing sir if only i would believe in Noah Ark thing.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818835</guid>
				<title>Temple at the Center of Time by David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-818835</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>David Wheeler</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I have read this book right through once, and am now going through it again with a fine-toothed comb.<br /> It contains some very interesting, verifiable facts, some rather hazy conjecture and some errors. However my advice is,</p> <p>"Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater."</p> <p>There is some real evidence of the Creator in this work.</p> <p>Example 1.<br /> There are 360 degrees in a circle.<br /> Before Noah's flood the Earth took 360 days to circle the Sun. Hence 360 days in a year, and the Earth moved 1 degree round the Sun each day.<br /> There have always been:<br /> 7 days in a week - from creation week,<br /> 7 colours of the rainbow,<br /> 7 notes before a repeat,</p> <p>Pi is an immutable number relating the length of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.</p> <p>If you multiply 360 x 7 x Pi, you come up with the diameter of the earth in statute miles.</p> <p>Example 2.<br /> If you multiply 360 x 6 x Pi you come up with the circumference of the moon in statute miles.</p> <p>These examples stretch coincidence to the limit.</p> <p>Incidentally 360 is the smallest number divisible by 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 and 9.</p> <p>The smallest number divisible by 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 is 2520, which is the number of days in seven prophetic years - mentoned particularly in the Book of Daniel 9:24-27.</p> <p>In my humble opinion I believe that the last seven years - 2520 days - of this phase of creation, before the final return of Jesus Christ, will likely start with a seven year peace treaty/ceasefire between Israel and her Islamic neighbours around 2012. This treaty will be signed by Prince Charles, Prince William or both.</p> <p>David Wheeler.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-768071</guid>
				<title>Re: David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-768071</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>bikenbeer2000</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>403189</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>So if you've read his book, you should be able to give us examples of his 'important' findings which are both concrete and undeniable. I wait with interest.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-767935</guid>
				<title>Re: David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-767935</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>guest</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>You should read someones work before destroying it. A large part of Flynns work is concrete and undeniable,of course you would actually have to read it to know that. Your hate speech against a very important man makes it clear that you will probally never be half the scientist that Flynn is today.Thank you for wasting my time on your little rant of a site.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-745904</guid>
				<title>What a sham!</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-745904</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Stephen</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>David Flynn's forum is run by some of the most immature idiotic moderators on the planet.</p> <p>The 2 childish woman ban anyone who even slightly disagrees with their views.</p> <p>it should be well noted also that David Flynn predicted the Tribulation and the 2 Witnesses to show up July 19th, 2009 which was a failed prediction.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-695024</guid>
				<title>David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-695024</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Alene Y</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>344540</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I haven't read his books, so I don't know where he gets his "theories". He isn't a scientist and "At no point does Flynn tell us what he studied in college, how he conducts his research, or where his research is published (other than his books)." His "theories" have been discredited by scientists, including Phil Plait. Anyone can come up with a half-baked idea and write a book about it, but that doesn't make it true. The fact that he has no scientific background certainly doesn't give him any credibility. You should base your conclusions about scientific matters on the work of people who know something about science instead of any scientifically illiterate screwball who dreams something up and writes a book.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-694999</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-694999</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Re:</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>up top doesnt really explain his perspection..i dont understand his theorie</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-694263</guid>
				<title>David Flynn</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-694263</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Alene Y</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>344540</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The page above tells what his books are about. I doubt that he thinks it will end in 2012. He is just cashing in on the hysteria like most of the authors and "researchers" writing about 2012.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-694007</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/david-flynn/comments/show#post-694007</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Re:</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>what are hisbooks about and why does he think it will end in 2012</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>