<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;7 Reasons&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show</link>
		<description></description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:04:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292150</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292150</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Gary A</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>844537</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I didn't really think it mattered as juju had responded before me my post would have appeared below his anyway. My apologies, I'll hit the reply button to my intended target from now on.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292143</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292143</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>obaeyens</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>612249</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Gary, you seem to have a knack on pressing the wrong reply button. :-)<br /> I think you want to reply on cern not juju? ;-)</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292139</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292139</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>obaeyens</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>612249</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>If you feel strongly that you are still in the right, surely you can show evidence that the sun's magnetic field has absolutely no effect on earths magnetic field and how it functions.</p> </blockquote> <p>Both Sun and Earth's magnetic field are not strong enough to have any noticeable effect except for the Northern lights and the shape of the magnetic field. And long power lines.</p> <p>The radiation of the Sun has a very clear effect because it provides heat.</p> <p>But in regard to Earth quakes or any other wild and big effect, the answer is that the effects is much lower than an Elephant crossing the street.</p> <p>Maybe you should look up the magnetic field strength of Earth's magnetic field and the Sun at Earth's distance. And compare that with your typical refrigerator magnet. ;-)</p> <p>I repeat: Magnetic does not equal magic! Magnets act just like normal physical springs. If you add energy by pushing it towards another magnet that wants to repel then you add energy. When you release it then it releases energy by pushing itself away. It does not magically increase energy out of nothing.</p> <p>The second thing is that a magnetic force can only act on charged particles. The average number of charged particles on the complete Earth is limited and maximum 4 Coulomb. So it simply has nothing to grab onto to do anything.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292138</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292138</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Gary A</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>844537</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>If the sun is going into a high activity cycle I believe it is direct evidence that we should precaution here on earth.</p> </blockquote> <p>First off, who said it was going into a &quot;high activity cycle?&quot; Second, if you're claim is that solar activity causes volcanos (which was indeed your original claim) then what kind of precautions should we take? Plug the volcanos with giant balls of rubber?</p> <blockquote> <p>If you feel strongly that you are still in the right, surely you can show evidence that the sun's magnetic field has absolutely no effect on earths magnetic field and how it functions.</p> </blockquote> <p>This has absolutely nothing to do with your original claims of a volcano looking like a sunspot and a sunspot causing volcanos. The sun affects the magnetic field of earth, we have never disputed that, so why you would try and twist our words in this way is anybodys guess.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292131</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292131</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>3WMElliott</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>487486</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>I just don't see how you all outright deny that the suns complex and powerful inner workings have a negligible effect on the inner workings of Earth.</p> </blockquote> <p>Until sufficient evidence is shown that it <em>does</em>, I'll be denying it for a long time to come. The same reason I deny that gravity is caused by angels pushing down on my shoulders, the same reason I deny little green men have ever existed on the surface of Mars - where is the evidence?</p> <p>You've got a question, is there a link between the Sun and Volcanoes (assuming we're still discussing the original claim), so head on towards the next steps, devise a method by which you can test that hypothesis one way or the other.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292118</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292118</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>TheGreatJuju</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>469590</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>I just don't see how you all outright deny that the suns complex and powerful inner workings have a negligible effect on the inner workings of Earth.</p> </blockquote> <p>Let's assume it has a negligible effect. Do you know what &quot;<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/negligible">negligible</a>&quot; means?</p> <p>Nobody has to deny something that you can't provide any evidence for to begin with.</p> <blockquote> <p>It's effects are strong right out past the last exo planet.</p> </blockquote> <p>Name one, and explain what the effect does.</p> <blockquote> <p>If the sun is going into a high activity cycle I believe it is direct evidence that we should precaution here on earth.</p> </blockquote> <p>What precautions? Anything the Sun can do near a solar maximum, it can do at any other time.</p> <blockquote> <p>If you feel strongly that you are still in the right, surely you can show evidence that the sun's magnetic field has absolutely no effect on earths magnetic field and how it functions.</p> </blockquote> <p>Of course the Sun affects Earth's magnetic field, at times drastically. Ever heard of aurorae? However, &quot;the Sun affects Earth's magnetic field&quot; was <em>not</em> your original claim.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292099</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1292099</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Cern</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>994487</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I just don't see how you all outright deny that the suns complex and powerful inner workings have a negligible effect on the inner workings of Earth. It's effects are strong right out past the last exo planet. If the sun is going into a high activity cycle I believe it is direct evidence that we should precaution here on earth.</p> <p>If you feel strongly that you are still in the right, surely you can show evidence that the sun's magnetic field has absolutely no effect on earths magnetic field and how it functions.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1289149</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1289149</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>obaeyens</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>612249</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>When viewed from space with a camera that measures temperature it looks deadly similar to a sunspot.</p> </blockquote> <p>This sounds weird. How can something looking like a sunspot here on Earth have anything to do with a sunspot?<br /> Especially when Earth rotates and any influence there might be, get smeared out over a period of 24 hours?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288961</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288961</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>3WMElliott</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>487486</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>When viewed from space with a camera that measures temperature it looks deadly similar to a sunspot.</p> </blockquote> <p>So does my kettle in this freezing kitchen of mine. So do these brake discs after a few laps of the track. Your point? That things look the same? Where's the science?</p> <blockquote> <p>As the activity increases so will this volcanoes?</p> </blockquote> <p>Let's assume that both sunspots and whatever this volcano is <em>will</em> increase over the next month or whatever. Where's the link between the two? What's the science? If there isn't any, it's like saying the volcano was triggered by my choice in sock colour last week. Heck, so were the sunspots, while we're at it. Until I provide testable science that links my socks to the Sun, you frankly should ignore whatever I say on the matter.</p> <blockquote> <p>Tough to make a connection like this cause we simply have never had the opportunity to study things like this in detail</p> </blockquote> <p>In detail, no. In general terms, yes. We've been studying sunspots for a good hundred years, recording them for hundreds more, and have been able to recreate patterns back as far as a good few thousand years. We've also got the much more easier to study in detail records of volcanoes. Do we see a link between the two? Well that's the key piece of evidence you need to be looking for.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288913</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288913</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Gary A</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>844537</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>seems to coincide with the giant sun spots lately.</p> </blockquote> <p>Come on man, that's a doomsayer tactic. &quot;Hey, something a little strange (normal really, but ya know how them crazy doomers roll) is happening on earth, let's look for something in space that we can say is causing it&quot;. Sunspots do nothing to us here on earth, unless they are throwing flares and CME's at us, and even that only messes with satellites or electrical grids in very very extreme circumstances.</p> <blockquote> <p>When viewed from space with a camera that measures temperature it looks deadly similar to a sunspot.</p> </blockquote> <p>You're not serious are you? Sunspots are actually planet sized a lot of the time. I think you need to learn a little more about sunspots and how they form, you've really made an insane claim there and it looks to be copy pasted straight from woo land.<br /> <a href="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot">http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot</a></p> <blockquote> <p>As the activity increases so will this volcanoes?</p> </blockquote> <p>No. Again, that's pretty insane. This is an echo of the whole &quot;Elenin causes earthquakes&quot; crap. We've always had earthquakes, we know how and why they happen, but in 2011 all of our knowledge of plate tectonics went out the window and all of a sudden they were caused by a comet. Totally redicilous. You're trying to connect the same dots, you're trying to take normal events and suddenly give them a &quot;it's coming from out there&quot; spin.</p> <blockquote> <p>Tough to make a connection like this cause we simply have never had the opportunity to study things like this in detail</p> </blockquote> <p>No, it's tough to make a connection like this because there is none. The only way you can make a connection is by taking the doomsayer route of trying to make every negative occurrence, floods, earthquakes, volcanos etc, seem like they're unusual, therefore they must be caused by something astronomical. Tsk tsk Cern.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288898</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288898</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Chantal38</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1216555</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>hmmm never heard of sunspots influencing\causing eruptions, also I was unable to find any evidence on this caldera formation except the usual woo woo sites, which i'm not going to name as they do not need visitors. Caldera do indeed show uplift before an eruption but it is only one of many signs and does not signal that an erruption is imminent. Do you have a credible site that I can view? See the posts on yellowstone for more info:)</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288869</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288869</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>TheGreatJuju</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>469590</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>What is this I hear about a super-volcano forming in Bolivia? Anyone care to enlighten?</p> </blockquote> <p>Apparently you've heard wrong, because they don't even know whether it will form a new &quot;super-volcano&quot; yet. Considering <a href="http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/region.cfm?rnum=1505">the area in question</a>, something like this really shouldn't be all that surprising.</p> <blockquote> <p>seems to coincide with the giant sun spots lately. When viewed from space with a camera that measures temperature it looks deadly similar to a sunspot. As the activity increases so will this volcanoes? Tough to make a connection like this cause we simply have never had the opportunity to study things like this in detail</p> </blockquote> <p>Are you trying to make a joke that I'm just not getting? Sunspots have nothing to do with volcanic activity, and a single volcano inflating is not indicative of any statistical increase in volcanism. There will be multiple active volcanoes across the planet at any given time.</p> <p>Why is this in the &quot;7 Reasons&quot; thread?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288807</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1288807</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 04:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Cern</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>994487</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>What is this I hear about a super-volcano forming in Bolivia? Anyone care to enlighten?</p> <p>seems to coincide with the giant sun spots lately. When viewed from space with a camera that measures temperature it looks deadly similar to a sunspot. As the activity increases so will this volcanoes? Tough to make a connection like this cause we simply have never had the opportunity to study things like this in detail</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1264044</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1264044</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Karlo</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I care because he's going to be giving seminars in my hometown. Just like any other city, Oshawa has problems, I don't want the likes of him being added to it.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1264030</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1264030</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Tomy2011</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>653512</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Why do you care if this Ron Clouzet is going to be giving seminars at a church? He is just another &quot;bible-decoder&quot; who claims to have successfully decoded the Bible. Harold Camping has claimed the same thing as many others and Ron will probably claim the same thing.<br /> So do not expect anything attention-worthy.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1263993</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1263993</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Karlo</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Another one of those bible people, Ron Clouzet, claims to have decoded bible prophecies. He is going to be giving seminars at a church in Oshawa, Ontario, starting September 30th. I hope some of you guys are there to prove him wrong.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1244027</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1244027</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Astrogeek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>334222</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>It's not all that surprising that someone would level the 'racism' accusation, but it is not supported by what we actually say. We document various deficiencies in the arguments made by the doomers <strong>about</strong> the Maya (for example) by pointing out that they are at odds with what we <strong>know</strong> about the Maya. Lets not forget, 'the Maya' is an artificial group describing only the people living in a certain geographic range during a certain time frame. The region in question was more culturally diverse than Europe was, and it was a much smaller area.</p> <p>So, if someone says that the Maya were an 'advanced civilization', I would reply that they were advanced for their time and place, but they were not what we would consider 'advanced', unless you think that human sacrifice is necessary to keep the world turning&#8230;</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1243666</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1243666</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>obaeyens</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>612249</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>As far as I know, no one here ever claimed that the Mayan calender was bad and that the Mayan civilisation was bad.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1243552</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1243552</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>3WMElliott</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>487486</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Were we (we being humans) racist against the Roman Empire when we switched from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar? It was so inaccurate by the time it was adopted in England that people rioted thinking that the Government stole 11 days of their lives jumping from the 3rd to the 14 of September.</p> <p>But maybe they were just being racist against the people of their own race&#8230;</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1243545</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/7-reasons/comments/show#post-1243545</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>TheGreatJuju</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>469590</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Jack&#8230;</p> <p>There is an error rate of 1 day per 4 years in the Mayan calendars, because they didn't account for leap years. Do you also consider it &quot;racist&quot; to point this out?</p> <p>Noting that another culture's calendar might have done the same thing as the Maya but &quot;better,&quot; has nothing to do with racism, and you're a turdhead for suggesting such a thing.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
