<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;11:11&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show</link>
		<description></description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-842468</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-842468</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Astrogeek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>334222</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hey Johan!</p> <p>Welcome back!</p> <p>Excellent! I'll add that to the page!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-842458</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-842458</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Johan</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I wrote a blogpost about 11:11 a year ago:</p> <p><a href="http://haecceities.wordpress.com/2009/08/04/2012-how-to-spot-a-prophet%e2%80%99s-maya-hoax-%e2%80%93-numerology-and-gematria/">http://haecceities.wordpress.com/2009/08/04/2012-how-to-spot-a-prophet%e2%80%99s-maya-hoax-%e2%80%93-numerology-and-gematria/</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-821138</guid>
				<title>Re: This webiste is missing the mark....</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-821138</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>bikenbeer2000</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>403189</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>That the event that ends the Mayan calendar - the winter solstice of 2012 - occurs at 11:11:37 is a staggering coincidence.</p> </blockquote> <p>The Long Count is a count of days. Day counts end after a complete day, not after some incomplete count of arbitrary units of 1/86400th part of a day. Would it be a "staggering coincidence" if the solstice were at 12:34:56?<br /> Also, we're talking about Universal Time, a time system based on an arbitrary meridian of the Earth far from the lands the Mayans inhabited and defined many centuries after the Mayan civilisation ended.<br /> If that's not enough, you have to show that the Mayans intended Baktun 13 to end on a solstice. John Major Jenkins has been trying to do this for years and I have yet to see anything at all convincing in his (or anyone else's) claims.</p> <blockquote> <p>Modern archeologists define this moment as the most significant transitional phase since mankind moved from hunter-gatherer to agrarian 5,000 years ago.</p> </blockquote> <p>Name one of these archaelologists and provide a reference to this definition.</p> <blockquote> <p>But if you think that we are not experiencing a great paradigm shift in defining how we live here on earth, I'd say you're trying to keep your head buried in the sand.</p> </blockquote> <p>I can do no better than repeat from the "Find Nibiru Challenge" blog (with a slight modification):<br /> <em>If you are one of the people who sees 2012 more as some kind of imminent "paradigm shift," then can you provide me with a clear, concise, exhaustive definition of this "paradigm shift." It would be nice if you could throw in some evidence that such a thing will actually happen, but you New Age guys are so behind on your work that you get a pass just for clearly defining your terms.</em></p> <p><a href="http://nibiruchallenge.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html">http://nibiruchallenge.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-821032</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-821032</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>ticktock</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>393455</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>But is that 11:11 am or Daylight Savings Time? Let's try to stay with both feet on the ground, shall we? The 11:11 phenomenon isn't even about the time, it's about perception. Whether it is a time on a digital clock or the same damn song on the radio, this is a well-worn technique of movie makers. So familiar to this gimmick are we that when it happens to us in real life, we expect the same end results.</p> <p>Picture the old farmer staring out at his corn field, when suddenly he sees a bright flash overhead and a roar of impact. The next few images are almost inevitable on film… a smoking crater, a glowing meteorite, the farmer poking the rock with a handy stick… followed by aliens leaping out and eating the farmer, or something equally startling.</p> <p>In real life, the farmer looks up and says "Gosh, another shooting star! I should tell Muriel. She likes shooting stars." And he goes back to watching his corn grow.</p> <p>The movies and TV will push the significance of hearing the same song on the radio. Your car is haunted. Ghosts are sending you a message. Your day is repeating over and over. In real life, it just means you turn your radio on at the same time every day and your radio station buys a music service. "Hey, Mr Bass Man" means it's 7:30 am. There is no significance.</p> <p>You say "ask a Mayan Shaman". Have you done so? What about all the interviews of Mayans who say that they are tired of silly white people asking them about 2012? They don't think their calendar ends at all. So, if the Mayans say their calendar doesn't end, then maybe the whole thing is just fabricated by people pushing New Age crap? Sound familiar?</p> <p>When you say things like "Modern archeologists define this moment as the most significant transitional phase" can you actually cite the name of a single real scientist that believes this? Someone that views 2012 as significant, not just this era?</p> <p>Try not to listen to the "5th Dimension" so much and read this site again more carefully.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-820983</guid>
				<title>This webiste is missing the mark....</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-820983</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Eric Rankin</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>While I am impressed with the presentation and work that went into this website to "debunk" all things 2012, it sadly misses the "shift mentality" held by so many people regarding this fascinating time in human history. What modern Mayan shamans will tell you is that we are hurdling towards a significant "choice point" on the path of our spiritual evolution. This time will be marked by challenging environmental woes - black earth, flooding, war - but that a "next level" of consciousness awaits those who hold a broader vision of what's going on all around us.</p> <p>A couple of points to argue in the defense of this "shift":</p> <p>The 11:11 Phenomenon is something more than what the author describes. It is people feeling triggered to "Wake up" to something profound, and people for decades have been getting this same feeling before they ever talk to someone else for the idea to be implanted. That the event that ends the Mayan calendar - the winter solstice of 2012 - occurs at 11:11:37 is a staggering coincidence. If you take the shamanic interpretation of the end of the calendar (a time of making important choices (waking up to a greater reality?) you see a very mystic coincidence. Besides, who else but the government "rounds up?" If you ask me what time it is and my watch says 11:11:37, I'm not going to tell you it's 11:12, right?<br /> Same thing regarding the Age of Aquarius. This "shifting of the ages" into Aquarius has long been defined as a time when humanity will reach beyond it's old ways of conduct (hatred - fear - violence) and willfully move into a "new age" of compassion and peace. Remember that old song from the 60s? It says these things pretty clearly.</p> <p>Like the author of this site, I do not believe that any one particular devastating event will occur on 12/21/2012. But if you think that we are not experiencing a great paradigm shift in defining how we live here on earth, I'd say you're trying to keep your head buried in the sand. Modern archeologists define this moment as the most significant transitional phase since mankind moved from hunter-gatherer to agrarian 5,000 years ago. Hey, and look at that… the Mayan calendar just so happens to track the same 5,000 year time span. Don't believe everything you read, but please don't shut yourself off from what is happening right here and right now. Wake up, open your eyes. A "new age" is (literally) upon us!</p> <p>Eric Rankin<br /> Author of "The Aquarians"<br /> A novel/love story that explores 2012, 11:11 and the Age of Aquarius</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-743414</guid>
				<title>Re: weakest section</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-743414</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Astrogeek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>334222</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Perhaps you can share with us the significance of repeated digits on clock displays? Is there any peer-reviewed research that supports this idea?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-743405</guid>
				<title>weakest section</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-743405</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>mmc</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>You did much valuable research on this 2012 thing, but this point is quite weak, except that it perhaps has no correlation to 2012.</p> <p>The 11/11 phenomenon goes beyond any correlations with Dec 21, 2012</p> <p>As one who often sees these kind of numbers in my life, I assure you, and I am sure you will take great surety in my saying so, that it is far more than noting common patterns in the course of days of observing numbers.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-639003</guid>
				<title>more than 12 &quot;signs&quot;</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-639003</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Kris Larsen</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The ecliptic currently goes through 13 constellations (including Ophiuchus) and over the 26,000 year precession cycle still other constellations can temporarily play the role of "zodiacal".</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-638563</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.2012hoax.org/1111/comments/show#post-638563</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>ticktock</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>393455</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>What I have never understood about the "significance" of the 11:11 GMT 12/21/12, is that if you call an adherent's attention to the fact that the Solstice is, of course, NOT at EXACTLY 11:11, but at something like 11:11 and 37 seconds… they act like the seconds are NOT significant. Why the #$% not? What is the rationalization for the hour and minute BEING significant, yet the seconds, irrelevant?</p> <p>The fact that 1) numerologists don't seem to care about the seconds and 2) it's only 11:11… sheesh… if it were REALLY significant, wouldn't it be 11:11:11? Or better yet, 20:12? ( 8:12&nbsp;pm?) Now THAT would even worry ME!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>